Conflict Between German And Australian Workplace Telephone...

In an increasingly globalized environment, employers often look for potential workers who are familiar in one or more foreign languages. Unfortunately, perceived linguistic competence is often based on fluency in the vocabulary and grammar of the target language, with less of a focus on sensitivity towards cultural and semantic differences. Left unstudied, these differences can easily lead to, at best, misunderstanding and confusion in the workplace. At worst, an employee not understanding the speech acts of another could find themselves offended by perceived â€Å"rude† behavior and perpetuate cultural stereotypes of the other group. As English is a Germanic language, the linguistic gap from an outsider’s perspective does not seem wide.†¦show more content†¦A speech act is defined by George Yule as â€Å"an action such as ‘promising’ performed by a speaker with an utterance, either as a direct speech act or an indirect speech act† (Yule 298 ). Germans tend to be more direct with speech acts, and more explicit than English speakers when expressing disappointment or blame; they are less likely to imply a request and more likely to outright give a command or complaint (Grieve 193-194). Whereas English speakers are more likely to be indirect and keep opinions and emotions to themselves, focusing on being polite during a complaint rather than being direct, Grieve writes that Germans are more content-, goal-, and truth-oriented than English speakers (Grieve 193). This difference in weight on the importance of politeness over directness is a critical sociolinguistic difference between English speakers and German speakers, and stems from a cultural difference in content of conversation. Whereas German speakers value the information-conveying function in a conversation, English speakers value the social bonding aspect (Evans Davis 218). However, this does not imply that Germans are simply impolite; in instances of broad social distance between Germans, Germans use more advanced politeness elements, similar to English speakers (Stranovskà ¡ et al., 769). Co-workers are considered to have a closer social distance than the distance

Samsung Electronics Business Plan Free Essays

Samsung Electronics founded in 1969 with its headquarters in Samsung Town, Seoul, is part of the Samsung Group, which includes dozens of companies with vast interests. Through the last 40 years, the company had risen to become a global leader in the consumer electronics brands market with its innovative products such as mobile phones, TVs, and monitors. At present, Samsung Electronics leads the Samsung subsidiaries with more than 157,000 employees in their various assembly plants and sales network across 65 countries around the globe. We will write a custom essay sample on Samsung Electronics Business Plan or any similar topic only for you Order Now With its revenue of $117. 4 billion in 2009, it has become one of the world class electronics company. Furthermore, Samsung Electronics industry is consumer electronics, Telecommunications and semiconductor. According to information of their corporate website, from its pioneer operations of an export business, the company has divested into electronics with specialty in digital, media, and microchips, memories, and systems integration. At present, the company’s innovative solutions on products and processes are recognized globally. The company attained a leadership position in the year 2009 when it surpassed leader Hewlett-Packard the erstwhile leader. Importantly, as a response to the downturn in the economy in 2009, Samsung Electronics of Seoul, South Korea, ‘implemented a structural reorganization to become more efficient to deal with worsening economic conditions. According to a Samsung spokeswoman Hwang Eun-ju, the changes were necessary to â€Å"effectively respond to the current global recession. † Samsung embarked on a management structural change from the sole Chief Executive Officer system, to a dual management structure with effective teams. Goals. Given revolutionary changes and opportunities digital age has brought to global businesses, Samsung electronics has and will continually respond with advanced technologies competitive products and innovativeness. Over the next five years and more, Samsung Electronics’ goal is to display unflinching commitment to making life easier and more comfortable for its consumers by taking advantage of the group’s key strengths: â€Å"New Technology,† â€Å"Innovative Products,† and â€Å"Creative Solutions. † Suffice it to say at this point that, in all the aforementioned goals, controlling cash flow and profitability will be an undertone. Products Samsung Electronics is the global leading manufacturer of memory chips, LCDs, and flat screen televisions, and is competitive in mobile manufactures. For over a decade, Samsung has maintained its leading position in microchip making. The company also manufactures an array of home appliances, TV/audio and video, cameras, and camcorders, monitors, and notebooks, and print solutions. In the area of wireless networking, Samsung Electronics developed protocols that were accepted internationally and used widely in foreign markets. Summary Organizational structure, control, and coordinating mechanisms are key variables for strategic implementation. An adaptive organizational structure facilitates changes in strategy, competitive moves, and changes in the environment. (Deresky, 2010, p. 257). Samsung Electronics which is a flagship of the Samsung group has carved a niche for its self in the consumer electronics market. Their major goal is to stay innovative to give value to their core groups- the industry, partners, and employees. In doing this however, an organizational structure that supports cash flow management and profitability will be erected to combat negative economic trends. References * Deresky, H. (2011). International management: Managing across borders and cultures (7th ed.).   Boston, MA: Prentice Hall. Samsung beats HP to pole position. Financial Times. Retrieved April 23, 2011 from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/c48d477a-0c3b-11df-8b81-00144feabdc0.html. Samsung Electronics Background. Retrieved, April 24, 2011 from ceridian.co.uk   www.ceridian.co.uk/hr/brochures/Samsung How to cite Samsung Electronics Business Plan, Papers

Cost for Product Quality of Manufacturing Firm- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theCost Accounting for Product Quality of Manufacturing Firm. Answer: Relationship Between Cost Control and Source of Supply The sourcing of material supplies is an essential process in an organization. The process of sourcing of material involves identification the suppliers and logistic service provider. The supplier will be from whom the goods are to be purchased while the logistic service provider will be responsible to bring the goods from the suppliers premises to the premises of purchaser (Madhavi, Mathew, Sasidharan, 2013). The entire process of material supply is crucial from the view point of cost control because cost of material supplies forms a significant part of the total cost of production. The management needs to be strategic in controlling the cost of material supplies. In the context of material supplies the cost control implies employing means and mechanism to reduce and control the cost of material purchased (Madhavi, Mathew, Sasidharan, 2013). The cost of material comprises the purchase cost and other expenses incurred in bring the material to the factory premises, which may include expenses such as freight, loading, unloading, and insurance. As part of the cost control process, the management sets budgets for the purchase quantities, prices and other expenses (Madhavi, Mathew, Sasidharan, 2013). The objectives of management are to ensure that the cost of material does not exceed the budget amount. In order to achieve this objective, the controlling and supervision of sources of material is necessary. The management needs to find out the sources of material where it can access qualitative material at low cost. Further, it should be noted that it is not the cost of material only which requires consideration of controlling but the quality of material is also important. The loose controlling on sources of supply may result in purchase of inferior quality of material. The inferior quality of material would further increase th e cost of production in the form of increased wastage (Madhavi, Mathew, Sasidharan, 2013). Impact of Source of Supply on Product Quality The sources of supply involve material suppliers and logistic managers. The sources of supply indirectly affect the quality of final product. The suppliers are responsible to make material as per specifications given by the purchaser. In case the suppliers provide defective material, the quality of the final product would be affected. The inferior quality of material would result in defect in production (Boon-itt, 2011). Thus, it is necessary to source the supplier of material carefully after reviewing the quality of material and negotiating the purchase price. Further, it is also necessary to take into consideration the controlling measures taken by the supplier to ensure good quality of the material. The other players in supply chain such as material packers and transporters also have impact on the product quality. In certain cases loose packaging of the material may affect its quality which in turn will affect the quality of final product. Further, the transporters are responsible to deliver the material in good condition to the purchasers premises. The laps in the transportation may deteriorate the quality of material. Therefore, it could be observed that all the participant of supply chain have importance for product quality (Benjaoran, Kaewsikhoa, Tabyang, 2012). Execution of Cost Control without any Significant Impact on the Product Quality In order to achieve the business objectives it is essential to have stringent cost controls in place. The purpose of having cost controls is to reduce the expenses so that profitability of the business can be improved (Wilson, 2015). Thus, the primary focus of cost control is on the cost cutting. However, it is notable that too much cost cutting may result in compromise in the product quality. Thus, it is essential to execute the cost controls in such a way that the impact on the product quality is minimal. If the cost controlling results in compromise with the quality of product, it will not benefit the company. In that way the company might save the cost but the revenues will be affected adversely. Due to low quality of product, the demand in the market will be down (Wilson, 2015). Thus, the essence is that the company should have cost controls but the execution of such controls should be in such a way that is does not compromise with the quality of the product. The cost cutting targets should be set in a realistic way; these should be achievable. The unachievable targets set by the management would result in compromising with the quality of the product (Wilson, 2015). Conclusion The discussion in this paper has been carried out on the aspects of cost control and the sources of supply. Further, the impact of sources of supply on the product quality has also been assessed. From the discussion, it could be articulated that the sources of supply have significant impact on the cost control. Further, it has been articulated that sources of supply also have great impact on the quality of the final product. However, the management needs to understand that the cost controls should be executed in such a manner that it does not affect the quality of the products adversely. References Benjaoran, V. Kaewsikhoa, A., Tabyang, W. 2012. A Development of Practical Cost Control System for Small and Medium-sized Contractors. IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(3), pp. 243-247. Boon-itt, S. 2011. Achieving Product Quality Performance: The Roles of Supply Chain Integration and Information Technology. International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology, 2(5), pp. 373-376. Madhavi, T.P., Mathew, S.V., Sasidharan, R. 2013. Material Management in Construction A Case Study. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2319-1163, pp. 400-403. Wilson, R. 2015. Mastering Project Time Management, Cost Control, and Quality Management: Proven Methods for Controlling the Three Elements that Define Project Deliverables. FT Press.